November 27: Imagine

Date #27November 27: What is imagination? Somewhere in the brain we are able to summon images. Is it what Robert Fludd, the 17th Century Hermetic philosopher and rhetorician, called the “eye of the imagination”?

Fludd, or Robertus de Fluctibus (1574–1637), was a prominent English physician best known for his compilations in occult philosophy and his interest in mnemonics “the system of spiritual memorising which is vulgarly called Ars Memoriae.” He conceived of our ability to picture things in our mind as the operation of an oculus imaginationis, a third eye situated in the brain, an organ of both memory and imagination.

The Oculus Imaginationis (The Eye of the Imagination) as found on the title page of Tractatus One, Section Two, Portion Three of Robert Fludd’s Ars Memoriae (Fludd, 1617).

This s not a universal capacity however. , Postdoctoral Fellow in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of New South Wales and Associate professor, UNSW report that “a small proportion of otherwise healthy people report having no visual experience at all. In other words, their minds are completely blind, [and they] are often startled to find that people are not speaking in metaphors when they say, ‘I picture it in my mind’s eye.’ This phenomenon of mind blindness has only recently been given a proper name – congenital aphantasia.”

Today, Marian Drew’s remarkable seven-metre photograph Twelve Wishes joins an exhibition Regale at Craft Victoria’s new gallery, Watson Place, Melbourne, Australia. With Christmas approaching, a celebration of celebrations is appropriate, and the exhibition of contemporary tableware and dressing is laid out on a ten-metre table beneath her framed printAs illustration of such a large artwork, I can only offer this tiny thumbnail (you’ll have to imagine it).

Marian Drew (2006) Twelve Wishes 111 x 752cm

On a large table, draped to reproduce the folds in the cloth of Leonardo’s Last Supper, appear bowls, not of ceramic, but of light forming white circles on the darkened linen and within each is food…road-kill in two cases. It is as if each is projected there from the imagination or memory of the photographer.

Born this day in 1918, a hard-drinking Chicago hotel porter claimed to be able to use his psychic powers to produce “thoughtographs;  photographic images made by placing a paper tube, that he called gizmo, between a camera and his forehead through which he would project his ‘mind’s eye’ vision of a subject, which would then appear on the film.

Ted Serios ‘projecting’ an image into a Polaroid camera in tests in the 1960s

Theodore “Ted” Judd Serios‘ (1918–2006) “thoughtographs” originally had supporters such as Denver psychiatrist Dr. Jule Eisenbud (1908–1999) who in 1967 authored The world of Ted Serios : “thoughtographic” studies of an extraordinary mind. (Morrow, New York). Most were sceptical and he was debunked as a fraud by professional photographers Charlie Reynolds (*1935) and David Eisendrath (1914–1988) who wrote in the October 1967 issue of Popular Photography that they observed Serios, when he thought no one was looking, sticking pictures into his “gizmo”. Though some claim he produced images without the tube, and at some distance from the camera, this is easily attributed to double exposure or use of previously made exposures, followed by the fake snapping of a picture. He can be seen in action in Rebecca Baron‘s short documentary film Detour de Force (dir.  2014) on Ted Serios.

Ted Serios ‘thoughtograph’.

Serios was not the first ‘thoughtographer’. In 1910 a psychology professor at Tokyo University, Tomokichi Fukurai, carried out in public experiments with alleged psychics Chizuko Mifune (1886–1911), Ikuko Nagao, and others. One of his fascinations was what he termed nenshu, or psychography – Serios’s thoughtography – but Fukarai’s demonstrations with Chizuko were considered a failure, the psychic was branded a fraud, the professor a dupe, leading to her suicide and his resignation.

Kirlian photograph of a button mushroom.

Fascination with the possibility that photography might record emanations, for want of a better term, we must admit, is not restricted to the gullible American public (who given the election result, will believe anything!), but is found worldwide. Kirlian photography is one instance; a technique for creating contact print photographs using high voltage, it was named after Armenian/Russian Semyon Kirlian (1898–1978), who in 1939 accidentally discovered that if an object on a photographic plate is connected to a high-voltage source, an image is produced on the photographic plate. It has been claimed as a ‘paranormal’ means of generating images of ‘auras’; emanations of the soul or spirit otherwise visible only to psychics.

Ada Deane (Spirit photographer) Spirit photograph of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 1922
The Daily Sketch, November 15 1924 reveals the true source of Deane’s ‘spirit heads’

Even against all evidence the desire to believe in a spiritual aspect of photography, or its capacity to prove its existence, remains strong. Arthur Conan Doyle‘s stories of the prince of deduction, Sherlock Holmes, reveal how logic can untangle cause and effect. Nevertheless, after a series of family tragedies the popular writer developed a belief in ‘spirit photography’, rife in the nineteenth century, which claimed to depict the ectoplasmic emanations of clairvoyants, and other ‘paranormal’ psychic phenomena. He encouraged Ada Emma Deane(1864–1957), a cleaning lady who became a photographic medium at age 58 and who very quickly one of the most famous mediums in Britain. Disembodied heads would appear in pictures taken by her which she claimed were departed spirits. Deane required that photographic plates be submitted to her in advance so that she could “pre-magnetise” them with her psychic powers.

Her most famous feat was to produce spiritualist images on Armistice Day commemorations in 1921, 1922 and 1923 until in 1924 The Daily Sketch won the rights to publish, on November 13, the photo she made showing a group of faces floating in a cloud above the Cenotaph in Whitehall. But two days later The Daily Sketch announced it had discovered the photo to be a fraud. The faces in the cloud were not dead war heroes; they proved to be of living sportsmen whose heads appeared exactly as they did in existing portraits of them.

Elsie Wright (1920) Frances and the Leaping Fairy.

Five photographs created by two girls Elsie Wright (1900–88) and Frances Griffiths (1907–86), achieved widespead notoriety because of their validation by the celebrated Doyle (1859–1930) who released in 1922 a book  The Coming of the Fairies, (London: Hodder and Stoughton Ltd) on their photography in Cottingley near Bradford in England.

It proved later that their fairy imagery was the result of their experiments with photomontage and collage to create images of fairies playing and conversing with them in a garden setting. Clearly loathe to disappoint their eminent supporter and other believers, the girls waited until 1981 before Elsie Wright confessed to Joe Cooper, who interviewed her for The Unexplained magazine, that the fairies were, in fact, paper cutouts.

So are we still inclined to accept that the ‘factual’ medium can produce images of a spiritual realm? In art of course, anything is possible. The series My Ghost by Adam Fuss (*1961) is one example where we are prompted to suspend our disbelief, or reassess our faith.

Courtesy: Cheim & Read, New York
Adam Fuss (2000) from the series My Ghost. Daguerreotype 20.3 x 25.4 cm.

Using the daguerreotype and the photogram, Fuss’ “images remind one of the early traditions of spirit photography,” writes Roberta Smith, in reviewing his work for The New York Times. Fuss’ use of flash to record, in large-scale photograms, moving subjects such as babies, snakes, water and smoke directly onto film and photographic paper relates to them to Kirlian photographs which themselves are photograms, also made without a camera.

Adam Fuss (1999) from the series My Ghost Photogram; gelatin silver print 184.9 x 123.3 cm

Long practice in ‘painting’ with light accounts for the ‘bowls’ appearing in her Twelve Wishes, at the top of this post, and extends through Australian photographer Marian Drew’s (*1960) work since her experiments of the eighties in New York in which fleeting, struggling human figures pay ghostly homage to Muybridge.

Marian Drew (1990) Response in Green Street

Her plaintively titled Still Life series alerts us to the disappearance of some native Australian fauna with the onslaught of clearing and the invasion of habitat by roads carrying lethal vehicles against which the wildlife has no instinctive defence. Some of these are incorporated into Twelve Wishes, an ironic evocation in the current exhibition Ragale of Christmas feasting and the creatures mentioned in the carol The Twelve Days of Christmas, with its piling up of ever more lavish gifts.

Screen Shot 2017-11-27 at 11.28.39 am
Marian Drew (2006) Lorikeet with limes.

WaterLine (2004) is a series of photogram murals commissioned for the Brisbane Magistrates Court to flow through five floors of the building. Here Drew figuratively disinters the invisible, long-lost freshwater spring, the Tank Stream, from beneath the site and from under the concrete of Brisbane.

Using the archaic materials of wet photography she makes visible the water, its motion, the lifeforms inhabiting it and its transparent substance.

Marian Drew (2008) The Creek that Leads to the Sea

A floating apparition, a vessel, formed from skeins of light, hovers like a blazing premonition on the water of a mangrove. Lightning flickers on the horizon. The threat of the European ghost-ship is all the more present and distinctly located as its spectre is reflected, vibrating, in the water, and casts its hard glare on the surrounding sand, bush and grasses, planting sharp blades of light along the aboriginal shore. This is Marian Drew’s Moreton Island, the Creek that Leads to the Sea (2008). Drew describes a physically exacting process, in this instance, of drawing with light and motion as she stood in the water with a torch to animate the invisible history and politics of her landscapes.

The eastern beaches (on the oceanfront, and along creeks leading to the sea) of Quandamooka (Moreton Island), were in 1833 the site of a massacre of the resident Ngugi by white settlers. Drew thus delineates the Queensland landscape to infer that a passage of experience from pre-European settlement co-exists with us, ready to be summoned forth to haunt our collective conscience. Nathan Shepherdson was prompted to write of this phenomenon in his book-length poem what marian drew never told me about light (2008):

my ability to remember is always a significant gesture

of exposure

my gesture is implicit

the materiality i live

liberating ephemeral material from decay

walking a line

throwing sand

moving into the frame

and through the body 

an extension into the image

By leaving light-traces of her physical movement Drew projects her ghostly, imagined self into the landscape image; a reversal, light-on-dark, of the usual photographic circumstance in which the photographer is behind the camera.

A sense of presence, a wraith as thin as imagination, is summoned forth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.